Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 12GB VRAM Tesla M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1112MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Tesla M40 +23458%
6.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla Maxwell
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
948 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1112 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.8 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.832 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-895-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy