Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +61839%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Oct 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
384
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

295W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G96
Navi 31
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy