Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile +1843%
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

40W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
G84
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy