Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 97% (1519MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +128%
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK110B
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy