Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1519MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +14%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM206
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy