Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1480MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +59%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GM204
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy