Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +2286%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
G94
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy