Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +373%
3.031 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA10B
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy