Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1530MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +309%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
80
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy