Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +489%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy