Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1404MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +155%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
1792
Shading Units
4608
112
TMUs
288
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy