Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q +42%
5.032 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P3200 Max Q +54%
85
Tesla K20c
55
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
2496
112
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy