Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +1596%
5.53 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy