Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +154%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy