Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +1037%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
1792
Shading Units
256
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy