Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1543MHz vs 1215MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +18%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
1792
Shading Units
1920
112
TMUs
120
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy