Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1543MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +155%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
80
1792
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy