Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +315%
5.53 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy