Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1733MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +516%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
640
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
68W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM107
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy