Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2050MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1363%
16.79 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net