NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1687MHz vs 1569MHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+7%
8.637 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+50%
126
RTX A2000 Mobile
84
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
20
2560
Shading Units
2560
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
