Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +11081%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy