Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +30744%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy