NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+1463%
8.945 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
