Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1747MHz vs 1215MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +187%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile
3.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
1088 MHz
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
10
2560
Shading Units
1280
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy