Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +915%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GK106
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy