Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
3832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +60042%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
1
3840
Shading Units
8
240
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
23W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
G98
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy