Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1645MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40m 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +150%
12.63 TFLOPS
Tesla K40m
5.046 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P6000 +161%
178
Tesla K40m
68
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
2880
240
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
245W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GK110B
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy