Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +147%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1344
120
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK104
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy