Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +622%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
384
120
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK107
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy