Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 +7090%
7.119 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
416.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
36
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
32
144
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
222.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
14.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.119 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
222.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G96
TU104-850-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy