Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2811%
9.492 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy