Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (1770MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +205%
10.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
2304
192
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK110B
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy