Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +13837%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
3072
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G84
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy