Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +3882%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
112
192
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G92
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy