Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +1421%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK107
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy