Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +568%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1024
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GM204
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy