Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1%
14.93 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
8192
288
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound M
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Related News

1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy