Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 +303%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117B
GPU Name
GK107
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy