Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM +2%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-IV

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
G92
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy