Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1000MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E8950 +241%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Feb 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
256.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GP107
E8950
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy