Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 40W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Aug 2004
Embedded
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
NV43
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Curie
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
110 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy