Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +2330%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2010
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
160
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Seymour
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy