Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1335MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +42%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2019
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
1536
144
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU116
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy