Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1283MHz vs 1266MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +77%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 20
3.284 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Nov 2018
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1283 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
740 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
189.4GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.06 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.6 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.569 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.284 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Vega 12
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XTA
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy