Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1266MHz vs 1250MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +82%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 14
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy