Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel GMA X3500

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel GMA X3500

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM GMA X3500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
320 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA X3500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Aug 2007
Renoir
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
FSB

Clock Speeds

400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
667.0 MPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.336 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Renoir
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake (G35)
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy