CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+1165%
1.152 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP
VS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
Renoir
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
36.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.304 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1152 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Mobile
2
Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
4
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
5
Intel HD Graphics 530 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
6
AMD Radeon Vega 8 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
7
Intel GMA X3500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
8
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel HD Graphics 520
9
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8450G IGP
10
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel HD Graphics 3000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy