CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+1165%
1.152 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP
VS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
Renoir
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
36.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.304 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1152 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
2
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 7480D IGP
3
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
4
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 6380G IGP
5
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
6
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon HD 8250 IGP
7
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
8
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
9
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
10
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy