Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9150

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +2917%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy