Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +2277%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy